Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Organic crops vs. GMOs








A Growing Debate: How to Define ‘Organic Food’

By: Dan Charles

An article from NPR

March 1, 2011

Summary

This article discusses the issue of GMO crops and the conflict caused because of them. The Department of Agriculture declared it legal for farmers in America to plant genetically engineered alfalfa this past February. Alfalfa is commonly used as feed for horses and dairy cows. The USDA’s decision was widely opposed, especially by organic food producers. At a Horizon Organic farm in eastern Maryland, the cows graze on pasture fields during the summer months. However, during the winter the cows have to eat a mixture of soybeans, alfalfa, silage, corn, clover and triticale grass because field grass doesn’t grow. In the corn, there is a little bit of something genetically engineered, and a lot of disagreements have been caused by this. The cross-pollination between organic and modified corn fed to the livestock is unavoidable, though.

In America, the majority of corn is genetically modified, and because corn is a cross-pollinator, organic corn often winds up with genes from GE corn, thanks to windblown pollen. This means that almost always, .5 to 2 percent of organic corn grown in the U.S. contains GMOs.

Regulations from the T require organic farmers to use organic farming methods on their crops, which are never allowed to be GMOs. So, even if a little bit of genetically engineered genes blow onto a crop, it can still be considered organic.

However, the public response to this isn’t so positive. Like Ronnie Cummins, from the Organic Consumers Association says, organic farmers need to do the right thing. If they’re not willing to sue the people who pollute their organic crops, then the public isn’t going to stand up for them. Other anti-biotech activists feel the same way. Groups against GMOs are now focusing on alfalfa, the GE crop most recently approved by the government.

The Organic Trade Association’s executive director even said that if “pollen from GMO alfalfa fertilizes alfalfa in organic hay fields, you can’t … sell it as organic.” That statement is hard to believe, because if it were true, meaning that organic crops are no longer organic if they are cross-pollinated, there would be barely any organic food left in the U.S.

Because of all the anti-GMO campaigns going on, people are starting to question whether or not to trust organic food. A lot of consumers insist on having no contamination in organic crops. In fact, according to a survey stated in the article, 77 percent of organic consumers would refuse to buy organic food if it was found to contain GMOs. That’s one of the primary concerns in the organic industry today-how consumers view their products. Even though only one-tenth of 1 percent of animal feed may be contaminated, people are still unsure of whether or not it’s safe to call it organic.

In conclusion, there have been a lot of arguments and disputes lately between the organic and GMO industries.

Opinion/Reflection

I was personally shocked about all the fighting going on between the organic and GMO industries. In fact, before we studied this topic in science, I was completely unaware that it was going on.

This article relates to science class because we have been discussing for a while exactly what GMOs are, and the arguments going on between organic and GMO farmers. I felt this article went along with that topic perfectly.

I think that both sides have a ton of support, so this dispute could go on for many years. In fact, I honestly believe it might, considering how popular GE crops are becoming despite how much they affect organic crops.

I feel that genetically engineering crops is pretty neat, because it can help improve plants and animals in some way. However, I don’t think it’s right that the GE crops can contaminate organic crops. Organic farmers need to make a living too, and it’s just not fair if GMO farmers can simply come along, plant their crops, and not have to worry what nearby organic fields they’re polluting. Buffer zones need to be between the two fields, or some other solution needs to be reached.

This whole argument is getting to a point now where I feel it needs to be resolved. I think that GMO crops should be allowed, but they must have restrictions, like not being planted so close to organic crops (that they could contaminate).

Ask Questions

1) Which side are you on? Organic farmers or GMO farmers?

2) Do you think a middle ground can be reached between the opposing forces? If so, what?

3) Do you think it’s logical for people who eat organic food to stop buying organic crops if they contain even traces of GMOs?

4) Do you agree with Ronnie Cummins’ statement that organic farmers need to begin standing up for themselves? Why or why not?

5) How do you feel about the Organic Trade Association’s executive director’s statement? Do you think it’s reasonable?

6) Do you think that GMO farmers will eventually run organic farmers out of business? Why or why not?


Add a graphic


The picture at the top on the left clearly shows a group of people protesting GMOs.


The image at the top on the right shows what genetically engineered alfalfa looks like. GE alfalfa is one of the most recent genetically engineered crops to be approved.

8 comments:

  1. This whole issue annoys me. Really good solutions exist (GMO farms have sizeable buffer zones, more extensive GMO testing, and labels for GE'd food), but the government refuses to use them because then GMO farmers would make less money. A better, bilateral solution is out there and would be easy enough to implement. But instead laws favor GMO farmers, which is extremely unfair. If GMO farmers are at risk of polluting other farmers' crops, then GMO farmers they should be responsible of preventing such contaminations.

    There are other things that concern me, too, like how GMOs don't have to be labled as such. I like to know what I am eating, and I wish that food was labeled with whether or not it was GE'd, how it was GE'd, and why it was GE'd. I just feel safer knowing what I put in my body. I find it disturbing that I could be unknowningly be making myself sick with untested GMOs.

    http://crs.uvm.edu/vtrpoll/2000/Gmo/Image18.gif
    I'm not the only one that would like to know what I'm eating. The aforelinked graphic shows that approximately 50% of people wouldn't buy food if they knew it contained GMOs.
    The poll also shows something a bit scarier; just over a third of the respondents (101 of 301) actually knew what a GMO was. Approximately 1/3 (100) gave an incorrect definition, and another 1/3 (100) didn't know what a GMO was at all.

    http://figuresmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/medley_gm_foods2.jpg
    This graphic is several years old and uses British statistics, but it is still relevant. It asserts that, due to the prevalence of GMO maise and soya (Britishism for soy), it is nearly impossible to avoid "GMO-derived" food. And, when the graphic was created in 2007, an astonishing 18% of the world's cultivated land is planted with GMOs. And in the US, some crops are predominantly GE'd. For example, 75% of US-grown corn is GE'd.

    http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/mba/lowres/mban128l.jpg
    I just thought that one was funny.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Reflection
    In my personal opinion, these organic people need to get a life. There are no known health effects of approved GMOs on humans, and the primary idea behind eating organic food is that it's made without artificial pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers, because THOSE could have possible health effects on consumers.

    Responses
    1) In case you haven't guessed by now, I'm with the GMOs. Until my food starts to attack me like I'm in a Tums commercial or an ear of corn starts growing from my body, I'm not going to care whether my food has this gene or that. Plus, the DNA tests to confirm the lack of contamination would
    a) Cost mucho dinero
    b) Raise the cost of the food
    c) Take a long time, during which my fruit is going bad.

    2) I don't really think there's a very apparent middle ground. Something is either organic or inorganic. It can't be a little of both

    3)I think people who won't buy food because one gene is different need to shut up and get a life. Again, there's nothing to suggest any health problems with GMOs.

    4) I don't agree. Organic farmers need to get their knickers out of a twist.

    5) I disagree. Again, the idea of organic food was to grow food that had been grown naturally, not to grow food that hadn't been in a petri dish.

    6) No #6, fingers fell off. :) Jk. I think GMOs will become the standard because they are generally cheaper and I think/hope/pray that people will wise up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why are organic supporters fighting within themselves? They are already a minority (at least according to the percentage of GMO crops compared to percentage of organic crops they are) and to try and overtake GMO's as the mass producedtype of crop they need to completely support each other and buy organic even if there is some GMO product in it. I could understand being mad if you bought organic food because you opposed GMO's and then found your organic food contained GMO's but I still believe that it is not a huge problem. The reason I think this is because from my studies of GMO's for homework and from what I have learned in class the dangers they have found that exist from eating GMO products such as an increased case of cancer in some cases I have gained the impression that such dangers come in small amounts that would only become dangerous after years of exposure. If that is the case and there are only trace amounts of GMO's within the organic crops then it seems to me that the dangers that GMO's pose would be almost non-existant. Of course that is only the impression that I have gained and it would not be the first time I was wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Answer the questions

    1) I support the organic farmers because the GMO companes do not care enough to prevent the pollen from GMO plants from getting into organic plants thus making those products "unorganic" according to more than 3/4 of the organic market consumers.
    2) I think that a middle ground could easily be reached. It appears that organic farmers are ready and willing to make an agreement that benefits and protects both sides intrests. The GMO companies just need to get off their "high and mighty" throne and make the deal.
    3) No of course not. You could talk to any expert and they would probably make no difference in the food or what it does to you. The only reason that organic supporters are getting upset is because they view GMO's to be more or less of the devil.
    4) Yes because this problem is going to severely hurt their sales and they need to do something to convince either the companies to fix it themselves or lawmakers to force them to fix it.
    Final 2 answers coming soon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 5) I believe his statements are COMPLETELY out of line. That is completely unreasonable and if he insists to continue doing his business like this then all those farmers who have accidental cross pollination and are prevented from selling their prodcuts are going to probably stop growing organic and start growing GMO's or grow something in the middle of it.
    6) No because as long as there are two kinds of products that can be grown there will also be people who buy organic and make it a very profitable market.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Who is this double forte character??

    ReplyDelete
  7. Eric - you make an interesting point, and just playing devils advocate, but the same was said about cigarettes way back when.... just sayin'

    ReplyDelete